Issue - meetings

Selection Criteria for Freedom of the City

Meeting: 13/03/2018 - Executive (Item 39)

39 Freedom of the City Procedures pdf icon PDF 120 KB

To consider the report of the Corporate Manager, Democratic & Civic Support.

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

Agreed

 

 

That that the report be deferred.

 

Reason for Decision:

 

To clarify the position with regards to Freedom of Information.

 

Minutes:

The Corporate Manager, Democratic & Civic Support presented the report which sought approval to introduce a more rigid assessment process for the consideration of any nominations made for Freedom of the City.

 

Members were advised that, following the Council’s recent consideration of a number of nominations for Freedom of the City, it was suggested that a more transparent approach to the consideration of these nominations be made, before submission to an Extraordinary Council meeting. The procedure put forward was based upon the nomination process for a UK national honour. The proposal suggested that a panel be established comprising of a representative of each political group, the Chief Executive & Growth Director or a member of the Strategic Management Board, the Corporate Manager Democratic and Civic Support and an independent representative. This independent representative position would be advertised and interviewed by the panel following the submission of an application form.

 

The Council’s decision on the nominations would be final and it was noted, that this would be the only way that the Council would accept nominations for Freedom of the City.

 

Members had concerns with regards to the potential release of information regarding nominees under Freedom of Information Regulations and agreed that the report should be deferred to allow clarification to be sought.

 

RESOLVED that the report be deferred to enable clarification with regards to potential disclosures under Freedom of Information regulations on nominees.