Issue - meetings

Review of the Corporate Risk Register

Meeting: 05/09/2023 - Executive (Item 83)

83 Review of the Corporate Risk Register pdf icon PDF 545 KB

To consider the report of the Director Finance.

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

Agreed:

 

RESOLVED that:-

 

(1) a quarterly report on the Corporate Risk Register be submitted to the Executive as the responsible committee to ensure it takes necessary actions to mitigate any identified risks for which it is responsible; and

 

(2) the revised Risk Register in Appendix A of the report presented at the meeting, be noted, with Members assured that the proposed mitigations set out are appropriate to address the risks identified.

 

Reason for Decision: As set out in the report.

 

 

 

Minutes:

The Executive received the report on the Corporate Risk Register and were advised that as part of the Council’s revised approach to risk management, the register was now based on the delivery of the Corporate Plan 2022-26.

 

Members were advised that the Council’s Directors had been working with their relevant Portfolio Holder’s to capture the risks and mitigations. The risk register would be reviewed on a quarterly basis by the Strategic Management Board (SMB) and would be reported to the Executive for monitoring.

 

Particular reference was made to the Audit and Governance Committee, who would continue to have a role in ensuring that the Council had a robust process for identifying and mitigating risks. It was also expected that some of the likelihood risk scores on the register should decrease over time as focus is made on specific areas.

 

The Leader enquired on the matrix table and how risks were scored.

 

The Chief Executive advised on how risk scoring was achieved. The inherent risks indicated an assessment of the overall risk and the residual risk was the risk that remained after the controls and mitigations. Where scoring remained red but with a lower risk score meant that the Council had reduced the likelihood of the risk occurring. Directors would work on coming up with additional proposed mitigations for discussion with Portfolio Holders.

 

Councillor Jobson, as an opposition group leader, spoke on this item and thanked officers for the hard work involved to date.

 

Councillor D. Moore, as an opposition group leader, spoke on this item and expressed concern on there being no mitigations or lead resource allocation for the Net Zero and Climate Crisis. She raised concerns relating to the misalignment of the UK with the Devon Climate Plans, which needed to be considered with greater caution and actioned sooner, with analyses on the impacts of failing to mitigate reducing greenhouse gases or adapt the city to future challenges. The Council needed to take a similar approach to the Government in policy and strategy for addressing Net Zero in the city.

 

Councillor Moore raised the following three questions:-

 

(1)  In relation to building greater neighbourhoods and communities, why was the risk of low land/property values and lack of investment appetite, a greater inherent risk than residents not being able to afford to rent or buy the new homes built under this approach?

 

(2)  Which consultants had been appointed to undertake the full business case for the Exeter Development Fund and what are targets for the delivery of affordable housing and infrastructure under this model and will they be modelling the greenhouse gas emissions for the programme delivery of the fund?

 

(3)  Would each Portfolio Holder undertake a serious attempt at properly assessing the policies and strategies of the Council and the partnerships they are involved in to reduce inequality and address climate change.

 

The Leader advised that the risk register report was in relation to the overall risks of the Council and how they were being addressed. Individual risks would  ...  view the full minutes text for item 83