57 Costed Organisational Carbon Footprint Projections to 2030
PDF 879 KB
To consider the report of the Strategic
Director for Place.
Additional documents:
Decision:
Agreed:
RESOLVED that
(1) The Carbon Footprint Projections, study
including associated challenges and cost to the City Council, are
noted and this information will be reported to Strategic Scrutiny
Committee in September 2025.
(2) Members note progress to date and further
carbon reduction potential under the assessment of Scope 1 and 2
carbon reduction scenarios available to achieve net
zero.
(3) A further report is considered by
Executive, which identifies options for how Business as Usual (BAU)
carbon reduction measures can be incorporated into annual Service
Plans, to enable prioritisation of service led GHG emission
reduction measures.
(4) The Net Zero team works in collaboration
with relevant Services to plan future funding bids to secure
additional resources, prioritising social housing, buildings and
transport services to support emission reductions.
Reason for Decision: As set out in the
report.
Minutes:
The Executive received the
report presenting a summary of the “Costed Organisational
Carbon Footprint Projections to 2030”, study carried out by
the University of Exeter.
Particular reference was made
to:
- that this had been a
truly groundbreaking study, and had been able to highlight the true
cost of decarbonising put services;
- the report considered
three scenarios- business as usual (BAU), Mid-term and Max-term net
zero;
- scope 1 and 2
emissions were direct emissions such as fleet vehicles, and
indirect emissions such as when buying electricity;
- business as usual
were measures that were already being taken or committed to, to
reduce carbon emissions. Retrofit within Council Housing was given
as an example;
- the mid and max terms
required much larger reductions to be considered. New technologies
would be required for homes. Fundamentally it would be switching
from gas to electric, this would cause energy prices to go
up;
- most mid and max
measures were unaffordable currently;
- the next stage would
be to understand how the council could explore additional BAU
measures;
- BAU would be
challenging, and additional funding would be required;
and
- to escalate to mid
and max, significant capital investment would be
needed.
During discussion, Executive
Members raised the following points and questions:
- the Council were very
lucky to have this incredible knowledge on their
doorstep;
- BAU was a misnomer
and suggested that nothing was being done which was not the
case;
- integration across
the council was needed;
- the opportunity for
scrutiny to look at this report in September was
welcomed;
- the report was
extremely useful to be able to refer to and provided a sounding
board;
- would the next report
go into the detail of service-led prioritisation?
- BAU was dismissive of
the amount of work which had been carried out by
officers;
- Exeter had the first
Passivhaus swimming pool in the country;
- could officers
provide more information about decarbonisation of the national
supply?
- carbon footprint
could indicate running cost, and the cost of running a swimming
pool was high, how can we decrease?
- it was incredibly
difficult to retrofit and bring down the carbon footprint of a
building such as the RAMM;
- the Leader was
interested to know if the report should have provided more
information on investment in trees.
Councillor Moore as an
opposition group leader raised the following points and
questions:
- she hoped government
would be lobbied for funding to undertake this work;
- would the next report
set out the savings to the council in terms of the return on the
investment being made?
- would there be
benefits for taxpayers and residents as bills to the Council would
decrease?
- when looking to
continue BAU route, there were many areas which either did not show
reductions or they were minimal by 2030;
- if BAU was pursued,
when would reductions in carbon emissions be evident?
and
- would the Executive
include investment in nature as one of their
priorities?
In response to questions
raised, the Strategic Director for Place and the Net Zero Project
Manager advised that: