Agenda item

Notice of Motion by Councillor Pearce under Standing Order No. 6

 

Standing Up for Responsible Tax Conduct

 

Full Council notes that:

 

1.    The pressure on organisations to pay the right amount of tax in the right place at the right time has never been stronger.

2.    Polling from the Institute for Business Ethics finds that “corporate tax avoidance” has, since 2013, been the clear number one concern of the British public when it comes to business conduct.

3.    Almost two-thirds (63%) of the public agree that the Government and local councils should consider a company’s ethics and how they pay their tax as well as value for money and quality of service provided, when undertaking procurement.

4.    Around 17.5% of public contracts in the UK have been won by companies with links to tax havens.

5.    It has been conservatively estimated that losses from multinational profit-shifting (just one form of tax avoidance) could be costing the UK some £7bn per annum in lost corporation tax revenues.

6.    The Fair Tax Mark offers a means for business to demonstrate good tax conduct, and has been secured by organisations with a combined annual income of £50bn and more than 6,500 outlets and premises, including many social enterprises and co-operatives.

Full Council believes that:

 

1.    Paying tax is often presented as a burden, but it shouldn’t be.

2.    Tax enables us to provide services from education, health and social care, to flood defence, roads, policing and defence. It also helps to counter financial inequalities and rebalance distorted economies.

3.    As recipients of significant public funding, local authorities should take the lead in the promotion of exemplary tax conduct; be that by ensuring contractors are paying their proper share of tax, or by refusing to go along with offshore tax dodging when buying land and property.

4.    Where substantive stakes are held in private enterprises, then influence should be wielded to ensure that such businesses are exemplars of tax transparency and tax avoidance is shunned - e.g., no use of marketed schemes requiring disclosure under DOTAS regulations (Disclosure Of Tax Avoidance Schemes) or arrangements that might fall foul of the General Anti-Abuse Rule.

5.    More action is needed, however, current law significantly restricts councils’ ability to either penalise poor tax conduct or reward good tax conduct, when buying goods or services.

6.    UK cities, counties and towns can and should stand up for responsible tax conduct - doing what they can within existing frameworks and pledging to do more given the opportunity, as active supporters of international tax justice.

Full Council resolves to:-

 

1.    Approve the Councils for Fair Tax Declaration.

2.    Lead by example and demonstrate good practice in our tax conduct, right across our activities.

3.    Ensure contractors implement IR35 robustly and pay a fair share of employment taxes.

4.    Not use offshore vehicles for the purchase of land and property, especially where this leads to reduced payments of stamp duty.

5.    Undertake due diligence to ensure that not-for-profit structures are not being used inappropriately as an artificial device to reduce the payment of tax and business rates. 

6.    Demand clarity on the ultimate beneficial ownership of suppliers and their consolidated profit & loss position.

7.    Promote Fair Tax Mark certification for any business in which we have a significant stake and where corporation tax is due.

8.    Support Fair Tax Week events in the area, and celebrate the tax contribution made by responsible businesses who say what they pay with pride.

9.    Support calls for urgent reform of EU and UK law to enable local authorities to better penalise poor tax conduct and reward good tax conduct through their procurement policies.

 

Minutes:

Councillor Pearce, seconded by Councillor Sheldon, moved a Notice of Motion in the following terms:-

 

Standing Up for Responsible Tax Conduct

 

Full Council notes that:

 

1.    The pressure on organisations to pay the right amount of tax in the right place at the right time has never been stronger.

2.    Polling from the Institute for Business Ethics finds that “corporate tax avoidance” has, since 2013, been the clear number one concern of the British public when it comes to business conduct.

3.    Almost two-thirds (63%) of the public agree that the Government and local councils should consider a company’s ethics and how they pay their tax as well as value for money and quality of service provided, when undertaking procurement.

4.    Around 17.5% of public contracts in the UK have been won by companies with links to tax havens.

5.    It has been conservatively estimated that losses from multinational profit-shifting (just one form of tax avoidance) could be costing the UK some £7bn per annum in lost corporation tax revenues.

6.    The Fair Tax Mark offers a means for business to demonstrate good tax conduct, and has been secured by organisations with a combined annual income of £50bn and more than 6,500 outlets and premises, including many social enterprises and co-operatives.

 

Full Council believes that:

 

1.    Paying tax is often presented as a burden, but it shouldn’t be.

2.    Tax enables us to provide services from education, health and social care, to flood defence, roads, policing and defence. It also helps to counter financial inequalities and rebalance distorted economies.

3.    As recipients of significant public funding, local authorities should take the lead in the promotion of exemplary tax conduct; be that by ensuring contractors are paying their proper share of tax, or by refusing to go along with offshore tax dodging when buying land and property.

4.    Where substantive stakes are held in private enterprises, then influence should be wielded to ensure that such businesses are exemplars of tax transparency and tax avoidance is shunned - e.g., no use of marketed schemes requiring disclosure under DOTAS regulations (Disclosure Of Tax Avoidance Schemes) or arrangements that might fall foul of the General Anti-Abuse Rule.

5.    More action is needed, however, current law significantly restricts councils’ ability to either penalise poor tax conduct or reward good tax conduct, when buying goods or services.

6.    UK cities, counties and towns can and should stand up for responsible tax conduct - doing what they can within existing frameworks and pledging to do more given the opportunity, as active supporters of international tax justice.

 

Full Council resolves to:-

 

1.    Approve the Councils for Fair Tax Declaration.

2.    Lead by example and demonstrate good practice in our tax conduct, right across our activities.

3.    Ensure contractors implement IR35 robustly and pay a fair share of employment taxes.

4.    Not use offshore vehicles for the purchase of land and property, especially where this leads to reduced payments of stamp duty.

5.    Undertake due diligence to ensure that not-for-profit structures are not being used inappropriately as an artificial device to reduce the payment of tax and business rates. 

6.    Demand clarity on the ultimate beneficial ownership of suppliers and their consolidated profit & loss position.

7.    Promote Fair Tax Mark certification for any business in which we have a significant stake and where corporation tax is due.

8.    Support Fair Tax Week events in the area, and celebrate the tax contribution made by responsible businesses who say what they pay with pride.

9.    Support calls for urgent reform of EU and UK law to enable local authorities to better penalise poor tax conduct and reward good tax conduct through their procurement policies.

 

The Leader supported the motion, particularly the principle of fair tax. The Council was operating in a fully tax compliant manner and should there be any budgetary issues involved in implementation, the matter would be brought to Executive for consideration.

 

Members made the following comments:-

 

·         in supporting the Motion, the one concern was whether the Council has the resources to undertake the necessary actions, particularly in respect of recommendation 6 in tracing ownership and clarity on the ultimate beneficial ownership of suppliers;

·         recognize that the Council already operates within the framework of the Inland Revenue Service IR35 rule;

·         welcome cross party support for this initiative;

·         note that the issue of fair tax is widely acknowledged both internationally and by many Councils and organisations in the UK; and

·         issue of due diligence can be examined through the Audit and Governance Committee.

In presenting his Motion, Councillor Pearce thanked Members for their support and made the following points:-

 

·         paying tax should not be viewed as a burden but of benefit to the wider community and as an anchor to many institutions. It can assist the Council in its wider aspirations such as its Green agenda and its Net Zero 2030 target;

·         whilst recognising the resource implications, the Council can lead the way, set standards and be an example to other organisations in the city, particularly with regard to due diligence; and

·         a minimum Corporation Tax of 20% is already recognised globally with many businesses signing up.

Councillor Pearce commended the Motion to Council.

 

Cllr Sheldon, in seconding the Motion, made the following points:-

 

·         reflecting Theodore Roosevelt’s quote of “Taxes are what we pay for a civilised society”, taxes should be used for the wider benefit of the community and enhance and support public services; and

·         it was important to demand clarity on the ultimate beneficial ownership of suppliers.

The Notice of Motion was put to the vote and CARRIED.